What’s Next ?

The Wuhan lab has the largest virus bank in Asia!

Below is the Wuhan lab which is at the heart of the US-China virus spat. The following information has been sourced from various news outlets, to update as many as possible on the other side of the story. We have been bombarded on most media channels with the mainstream version of events of what the WHO and the UN want us to hear. But there are other sources which paint a vastly different picture, and quite frankly their research makes more sense. They are well informed and make for highly informative reading.

What do scientists think they know about the (GOVID-19) virus?

“Researchers have noted that while there is no proof for the lab accident theory, there is also  no clear evidence that the virus came from the Wuhan market”.

A study by a group of Chinese scientists published in The Lancet in January found that the first COVID-19 patient had no connection to the market, and neither did 13 of the first 41 confirmed cases. (1)

Wall Street Journal reports:

Coronavirus: All evidence points to Wuhan labs as source of infection.

Written by John Cotton.   –   12:34PM APRIL 22, 2020

The US government is investigating whether the COVID-19 virus came from a government laboratory in Wuhan, China. The Chinese Communist Party denies the possibility. “There is no way this virus came from us,” claimed Yuan Zhiming over the weekend. Mr. Yuan is a top researcher at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, which studies some of the world’s deadliest pathogens. He is also secretary of the lab’s Communist Party committee. He accuses me of “deliberately trying to mislead people” for suggesting his laboratory as a possible origin for the pandemic. (Well of course! What else would they say. (Y.G)

Beijing has claimed that the virus originated in a Wuhan “wet market,” where wild animals were sold. But evidence to counter this theory emerged in January.** Chinese researchers reported in the Lancet January 24 that the first known cases had no contact with the market, and Chinese state media acknowledged the finding. There’s no evidence the market sold bats or pangolins, the animals from which the virus is thought to have jumped to humans. And the bat species that carries it isn’t found within 160km of Wuhan. **(Subscription required)

**Video: ‘China is playing us for mugs’ throughout the COVID-19 crisis

Wuhan has two labs where we know bats and humans interacted. One is the Institute of Virology, eight miles from the wet market; the other is the Wuhan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, barely 300 yards from the market.

Both labs collect live animals to study viruses. Their researchers travel to caves across China to capture bats for this purpose. Chinese state media released a mini documentary in mid-December following a team of Wuhan CDC researchers collecting viruses from bats in caves. The researchers fretted openly about the risk of infection.

These risks were not limited to the field. The Washington Post reported last week that in 2018 US diplomats in China warned of “a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate” the Institute of Virology. The Wuhan CDC operates at even lower biosafety standards.

While the Chinese government denies the possibility of a lab leak, its actions tell a different story. The Chinese military posted its top epidemiologist to the Institute of Virology in January. In February Chairman Xi Jinping urged swift implementation of new biosafety rules to govern pathogens in laboratory settings. Academic papers about the virus’s origins are now subject to prior restraint by the government.

In early January, enforcers threatened doctors who warned their colleagues about the virus. Among them was ** Li Wenliang, who died of COVID-19 in February. Laboratories working to sequence the virus’s genetic code were ordered to destroy their samples. The laboratory that first published the virus’s genome was shut down, Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post reported in February. This evidence is circumstantial, to be sure, but it all points toward the Wuhan labs. Thanks to the Chinese cover-up, we may never have direct, conclusive evidence — intelligence rarely works that way — but Americans justifiably can use common sense to follow the inherent logic of events to their likely conclusion.  (The Wall St Journal)

Another independent news group reports:

Less is known about the Wuhan CDC, which is a short distance from the Wuhan wet market where officials first said the virus emerged. Much attention has been focused on the WIV, which has a Biosafety Level 4 section where scientists work on the most dangerous pathogens. It should be noted, however, that coronaviruses aren’t deemed dangerous enough to require BSL-4 safety procedures. They are in a BSL-3 category, requiring less rigorous procedures.

The P4 laboratory, left, at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan in China’s central Hubei province on April 17, 2020.   Hector Retamal / AFP – Getty Images file.

In the accidental release scenario, a worker at one of the labs could have become infected and transmitted the virus to others. Those who suspect such a lab release point to the following:

  • A Jan. 24 study published in the medical journal The Lancet found that three of the first four cases — including the first known case — didn’t provide a documented link to the Wuhan wet market.
  • The bats that carry the family of coronaviruses linked to the new strain aren’t found within 100 miles of Wuhan — but they were studied in both labs.
  • Photos and videos have emerged of researchers at both labs collecting samples from bats without wearing protective gear, which experts say poses a risk of human infection.
  • A U.S. State Department expert who visited the WIV in 2018 wrote in a cable reported by The Washington Post: “During interactions with scientists at the WIV laboratory, [U.S. diplomats] noted the new lab has a serious shortage of appropriately trained technicians and investigators needed to safely operate this high-containment laboratory.”
  • According to Senate Intelligence Committee member Tom Cotton, R-Ark., the Chinese military posted its top epidemiologist to the WIV in January.
  • The Shanghai laboratory where researchers published the world’s first genome sequence of the coronavirus was shut down Jan. 12, according to The South China Morning Post.
  • According to U.S. intelligence assessments, including one published by the Department of Homeland Security and reviewed by NBC News, the Chinese government initially covered up the severity of the outbreak. Government officials threatened doctors who warned their colleagues about the virus, weren’t candid about human-to-human transmission and still haven’t provided virus samples to researchers.

Despite all that, most scientists and researchers believe natural animal-to-human transmission is the most likely scenario. (2)

(1)  

(2)   https://www.nbcnews.com/news/china/u-s-intel-community-examining-whether-   coronavirus- emerged-accidentally-chinese-n1185371?icid=related

There was one more link which I would have liked to include in this article. I found it highly informative, a real eye opener. Thanks to one very brave scientist, Dr. Judy Mikovits who has been persecuted for trying to expose the World Health Organization, Bill Gates, President Trump’s Health adviser, Anthony Fauci, and others, that the truth may be revealed and eyes opened. Unfortunately, YouTube has confiscated her interview on the grounds that it was proper-gander and contravened their YouTube criteria; which in my eyes just proves that anything you say against the establishment is made out to be rubbish and only what is in line with the mainstream is allowed to be heard. This is not democratic and is against our rights to have a voice. It also shows that their material cannot stand up on its own merit.

The material that was taken off YouTube was an interview on a documentary discussing the:

PLANDEMIC DOCUMENTARY (includes information and some text sourced from Google)


Whittemore Peterson Institute, a laboratory located on the University of Nevada campus in Reno, where Mikovits was research director. Mikovits was fired from the Lab in 2011. They said she “wrongfully removed lab notebooks and a computer. Mikovits claims she was arrested over the incident, saying she was dragged from her house at night and “held in jail without charges. The … Chicago Tribune tells a different story, but who would you rather believe.
 
https://www.mprnews.org/story/2020/05/08/npr-seen-plandemic-we-take-a-close-look-at-the-viral-conspiracy-video-s-claims

Plandemic is a feature-length ‘conspiracy documentary’ that … suggest that a global cabal of billionaires and drug manufacturers created the coronavirus pandemic as part of a plan to enforce “globally mandated vaccines.” a) The official Plandemic movie website puts forth the producers’ theory (which they say has been debunked) that … “the ongoing health crisis actually began 100 years ago with John D. Rockefeller, who “called for the standardization of medical education” and “began the practice of immune suppressive, synthetic and toxic drugs.” We read that Plandemic suggests Rockefeller’s “problem-reaction-solution” strategy has also been implemented with the coronavirus, allowing the wealthy to become even richer. “Plandemic will expose the scientific and political elite

who run the scam that is our global health system, while laying out a new plan”.

Who is the biologist who is featured in Plandemic?

“Plandemic Part 1 includes an interview with Dr. Judy Mikovits, a molecular biologist and medical researcher. Dr. Mikovits says that the Department of Health and Human Services “colluded to destroy [her] reputation” after she claimed that drug companies are fuelling corruption. According to Big Think‘s Derek Beres, Dr. Mikovits is a known anti-vaccine advocate (commonly known as an anti-vaxxer) and a staunch *critic of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases”.  *And some might say, “for Good reason”.

How can you watch the full Plandemic movie?

The official Plandemic Part 1 clip was uploaded to YouTube a week ago, but it has since been removed, as they say it
violates the site’s misinformation policy (according to their criteria for miss information). I would like to know what their qualifications are for decerning misinformation from a Dr of Biochemistry is?). As of now, the full Plandemic Part 1 video was available to stream, but it has also been taken down.
According to the Plandemic documentary website, the full-length documentary will be available from mid-2020.

Why does Plandemic keep getting removed from YouTube??

This week, YouTube has removed countless Plandemic videos from their site. The company claims that “the video was removed for violating YouTube’s Community Guidelines,” but many viewers, as well as the doc’s creators, feel that this is an example of overreach. “In an effort to bypass the gatekeepers of free speech” … At present the Plandemic website informs us that the link is invalid, as Vimeo has also removed the clip from its platform. If you can manage to find the documentary anywhere, (someone may have one secured) download on to a USB or other device, please grab a copy. You can then upload directly to all your favourite platforms.
It would be good just to keep a copy as a reference for the future. An excellent source to refer to when it all starts to happen.

(a)Anyone that listens to the news would know that, there definitely seems to be a plan to bring in compulsory vaccinations, and this is not a conspiracy. Just the other day I heard our P M say, concerning the sports men that do not want to be vaccinated, “no Jab no play”. The Healthcare workers across the country are being told, “no jab no work”. Some school children have been advised ,”no jab no school”. Mothers of babies have already been told ‘no jab no (welfare) pay”.

Rise Up Australia is not speaking out against Vaccinations, but we are speaking out against enforcing them, and making them mandatory, taking away peoples rights to choose, or blackmailing them by taking away the basics unless people fall into line and do as their dictated to by the government about matters that are of a personal nature.

I agree vaccinations have saved many lives and drastically reduced many deceases, but they have also taken lives and caused different health issues in many people. And there have been claims of toxic vaccinations being distributed. This is a good enough reason why people should have a choice. After all the vaccination is supposed to protect the vaccinated, so what is the problem if some people choose not to be vaccinated, they are only putting themselves at ‘risk’. Right! Unless there is something we are not being told, there should be no problem.

The danger with mandatory vaccinations or similar mandatory insertionsis: that it leaves it wide open for corrupt governments to come along and pump us full of, who knows what? Any
substance that could benefit their dictator powers.

Don’t say, it won’t happen! It is already in the box.

Bill Gates has openly suggested world depopulation by way of vaccines.

And it is in the movies!!! Just so we get used to the idea first.

Did Bill Gates ‘Admit’ Vaccinations Are Designed So Governments Can ‘Depopulate’ the World?

The computer magnate believes that vaccines can be used to reduce childhood mortality and ultimately reduce population growth through associated social changes, not as an agent of death.

ALEX KASPRAK Published 10 march 2017

If this were to become the accepted, what would be next? What other methods of control would we lay prey to?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Written by:

Yvonne Gentle
National Secretary
Rise Up Australia.

Posted on May 13, 2020 in Rise Up Australia

Share the Story

About the Author

Back to Top