It is refreshing, uplifting, and gives much hope to see there is a political party that is willing to be a voice for a large segment of the community who otherwise is not permitted to have a voice.
Australians are waking up day after day to find that more and more of our civil liberties are being denied us in some way.
The most recent of these (announced Monday, September 7th) is that having a difference of opinion to the government narrative on Covid vaccines could be a jailable offense.
Posting anti-Covid Vaccine information on social media – no matter how qualified the person is speaking, or whether it is a personal testimony of personal known fact, it could be now considered misinformation. And you could be charged and even jailed.
In other words, there is no freedom of speech anymore in this country.
This is unprecedented. Who would have thought Australia would become a Communist State with the Liberal Party at the Helm
This is why we want to thank Craig Kelly and Clive Palmer for giving us a legal political voice.
As a member of a political party, you have a voice and a right to defend and support the values of that party.
Below are some links with very important Covid information using independent qualified speakers.
Craig Kelly interviews Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, one of President Trump’s doctors. See link.
Dr Vernon Coleman says, what he has to share is quite possibly the most important information you will receive on Covid. See link
Repeat: Doctor Vladimir Zelenko talks to Israeli politicians and health minister. See link
Below are reports in the Guardian Newspaper and SBS News which refers to people posting miss information. They are reporting that there is a need for more severe measures to be in place to keep those that are anti the ‘vax’ from spreading what they refer to as misinformation. Our information is of course dependant on what kind of research has been done and the conclusions you have formed. We do have the right to disagree.
I have no doubt that people posting on social media like many other media outlets direct their words to convey the message that they wish to express. And maybe The Guardian, the MPs, and all those who are influenced by the massive pro-vaccination campaign are no different.
The Guardian reports…
“Australia’s drug regulator may refer anti-vaccination Facebook posts to federal police.
Labor MP Julian Hill lashes out at Greg Hunt for ‘lack of a national public health campaign to combat misinformation’ after his vaccine photo on Facebook receives ‘batshit crazy’ responses.”
This rhetoric has been tossed around for a while: This article is 3 months old. See link below.
SBS News Tuesday, 7 September 2021
As in the previous article, it is reported that social media writers reported false information regarding the number of deaths as a result of the Covid “vaccines”. This may be so, however, this article does not give an accurate picture of what was on the TGA website either. See link below.
This is the link to the TGA website: I have copied an excerpt directly from their website dated the 27th of May 2021.
“Reports of death following vaccination, particularly in the elderly
The TGA uses its adverse event reporting system to closely monitor reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination. During the early stages of the vaccine rollout in Australia and many other countries, deaths were reported following vaccination in older people living in aged care as this is where the vaccine rollout started. Many of these deaths were in frail elderly people and were coincidental with vaccination. This was confirmed following review by the TGA and medicine regulators in the UK, Europe, and the US which found no specific safety concerns from use of the vaccines in older people.
However, it is possible in frail older people that even relatively mild and expected adverse reactions following the vaccination may contribute to the deterioration of an underlying illness. For this reason, the Product Information documents for both the Pfizer and the AstraZeneca vaccines provide advice about vaccinating frail elderly people (over 85 years old) and warn that the potential benefits of vaccination must be weighed against the potential risks for each individual person.
By 23 May 2021, 3.6 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been given in Australia. In this period, the TGA has received 210 reports of deaths following immunization – 109 have been reported for the Pfizer vaccine, 94 for the AstraZeneca vaccine, and seven where the vaccine was not specified. Most of these reports (93%) were for people 65 years of age and over, and over three quarters were 75 years of age and over. Many of the deaths are related to elderly aged-care residents.
The TGA reviews all deaths reported after vaccination and monitors for safety signals. Part of our analysis includes comparing expected natural death rates to observed death rates following immunization. To date, the observed number of deaths reported after vaccination is actually less than the expected number of deaths.”
Wow! This is from the ‘Horse’s Mouth’. So can you blame people if they believe the ‘vaccine’ could potentially kill or maim them. And they say that the death rate of those that died after having the Jab was expected to be more. They seem to be suggesting that these people died because they were old and that was a risk that people need to consider when taking it. Question is, why coerce them into taking it then? Also, one needs to consider the likelihood of having adverse effects from the Jab. The total adverse effects to the 27th of May 2021 *were 22,031. This is just what was reported. It is believed by some doctors that the actual figures are always more than what is reported. And might I just finish off by saying that of course, it was the elderly that were dying because at that stage it was mostly the elderly that were receiving the ‘vaccine’.
Check out the website for yourself, scroll down and get all the facts.
*This figure is contained in the link provided. Please scroll down.
Written by: Yvonne Gentle